Barbershop Battle: Is refusing haircuts a religious right, or gender discrimination?
/ Chantal Braganza-
Shortly after being denied a hair cut at the Bay Street barber shop, McGregor filed a complaint with the Ontario Human Rights Commission. The story itself, though, didn't make it to the papers till this month. On November 3, Xtra! ran a feature on the issue by staff reporter Andrea Houston:
-
Toronto barber shop won't cut women's hair on religious groundsAll she wanted was a haircut.0 likes·0 comments
-
Toronto Star's Tim Alamenciak followed up this week:
-
Woman denied haircut goes to Human Rights Tribunal of OntarioA request for a lunch-hour haircut has turned into a battle over human rights, pitting freedom of religion against a woman's right not to...0 likes·0 comments
-
And then things heated up on Twitter yesterday. Whose rights trump whose? And need there be a hierarchy? Here's are some comments that stuck out for us.
-
@KimberlyAsal If his religion prevents him from being a barber, and following Ont's human rights law, perhaps cutting hair is not for him.
-
@ccamilleb It's a slippery slope to a pharmacist denying a woman Plan B on religious grounds. @sol_chrom
-
@ccamilleb @sol_chrom FFS! Do you know what "religious freedom" is? No one is trying to take away your right to be religious.
@ccamilleb You can't "impose" secularism. No one is saying you must reject your religious beliefs.
@KimberlyAsal I'd hardly call discrimination, "convenience." No one says he can't be a Muslim, but she has a right to not be denied service.
@KimberlyAsal Y'know you sound a lot like the Catholic school boards who screamed, "you can't FORCE us to accept gay-straight alliances!"
@KimberlyAsal Why is it absurd to expect that all businesses to serve all customers equally?
@KimberlyAsal And I believe there's been challenges to those as well. A woman-only fitness club faced a challenge. (looking for a link)
@KimberlyAsal That's why the case of the barber shop is a case of "competing rights." The Tribunal will decide, not you or me. Democracy!
@ccamilleb Um, no. I think a larger public debate is valid when practicing a religion means another persons rights are violated.